Certified Government Auditing Professional (CGAP) Practice Exam

When interviewing a suspect in a fraud case, what is the best approach for the interviewer?

1. Ensure the suspect's supervisor is present

2. Lock the door to prevent interruptions

3. Pay attention to the wording choices of the suspect

4. Ask directly if the suspect committed the fraud

The correct answer is: Pay attention to the wording choices of the suspect

Paying attention to the wording choices of the suspect is crucial during an interview in a fraud case. The language and vocabulary a suspect uses can reveal significant insights into their state of mind, intentions, and level of awareness regarding the events being investigated. Subtle nuances in the way a suspect communicates can indicate whether they are attempting to deceive or whether they are genuinely confused or worried. For instance, a suspect who is evasive or uses ambiguous language might be trying to avoid responsibility, while someone who provides detailed, consistent answers may be more likely to be innocent or have a credible explanation. Analyzing their responses also allows the interviewer to identify inconsistencies over the course of the conversation, which can be valuable in assessing the veracity of the suspect’s statements. Therefore, this approach not only helps in piecing together the facts of the case but also aids in building a psychological profile of the suspect, which can inform the direction of the investigation. In contrast, involving a supervisor could create an adversarial atmosphere, locking the door might create a sense of entrapment, and asking directly if the individual committed the fraud may limit the opportunity for the interviewee to engage more openly and reveal information organically.